What an allocation could look like — a draft to criticise
This is not an offer and not a sale. It's a draft I want to show before any decision: if something here looks suspicious, say so.
A decision about a token would only come after the first asset and an open discussion. There may never be one.
Allocation (draft)
- Project reserve40%
Funds purchases of real assets. The wallet would be public.
- Public sale30%
An open question: whether it's needed at all is under discussion.
- Liquidity12%
Locked exchange liquidity.
- Founder10%
4-year vest, 1-year cliff. Too much or too little? Tell me.
- Community8%
For people who help the project.
Why a token might be needed at all
- A way to take part in the project and support it
- A unit around which the treasury's public history is built
- Maybe it isn't needed at all — that's an option too
What the token will NOT be
- Not an investment product
- Not a share and not a right to any assets
- Not a promise of profit or income
does not existThere is no contract. If someone shows you an address for an "AUREUM LINK token", it isn't me.
This is an idea under discussion. No token exists, nothing is for sale and no money is being collected. If a token ever exists, it will not be an investment product and will grant no rights to any assets.